🔗 Share this article

Within the initial chapters of the publication Authentic, speaker the author poses a challenge: commonplace advice to “come as you are” or “bring your full, authentic self to work” are not benevolent calls for personal expression – they can be pitfalls. Burey’s debut book – a blend of memoir, investigation, societal analysis and discussions – attempts to expose how businesses take over individual identity, moving the weight of institutional change on to staff members who are frequently at risk.

Professional Experience and Larger Setting

The impetus for the book stems partly in the author’s professional path: different positions across business retail, new companies and in global development, interpreted via her experience as a disabled Black female. The conflicting stance that the author encounters – a tension between expressing one’s identity and aiming for security – is the engine of her work.

It arrives at a time of collective fatigue with corporate clichés across America and other regions, as opposition to diversity and inclusion efforts grow, and many organizations are scaling back the very frameworks that earlier assured progress and development. Burey enters that landscape to argue that backing away from authenticity rhetoric – specifically, the corporate language that reduces individuality as a collection of surface traits, peculiarities and pastimes, keeping workers focused on handling how they are viewed rather than how they are treated – is not the answer; we must instead reinterpret it on our own terms.

Minority Staff and the Act of Persona

Through vivid anecdotes and interviews, Burey shows how employees from minority groups – individuals of color, members of the LGBTQ+ community, female employees, people with disabilities – soon understand to adjust which identity will “fit in”. A sensitive point becomes a disadvantage and people compensate excessively by striving to seem agreeable. The effort of “showing your complete identity” becomes a display surface on which all manner of anticipations are placed: emotional work, revealing details and ongoing display of thankfulness. As the author states, we are asked to expose ourselves – but without the defenses or the confidence to survive what comes out.

As Burey explains, workers are told to reveal ourselves – but without the safeguards or the trust to endure what comes out.’

Real-Life Example: Jason’s Experience

She illustrates this dynamic through the story of a worker, a employee with hearing loss who chose to educate his co-workers about deaf community norms and communication norms. His willingness to share his experience – a behavior of openness the organization often praises as “authenticity” – temporarily made everyday communications smoother. But as Burey shows, that advancement was unstable. When staff turnover eliminated the unofficial understanding the employee had developed, the culture of access dissolved with it. “All the information departed with those employees,” he comments exhaustedly. What was left was the weariness of having to start over, of having to take charge for an company’s developmental journey. In Burey’s view, this is what it means to be asked to reveal oneself without protection: to endanger oneself in a structure that praises your transparency but refuses to institutionalize it into procedure. Authenticity becomes a pitfall when institutions depend on employee revelation rather than institutional answerability.

Writing Style and Notion of Opposition

Her literary style is both lucid and lyrical. She marries intellectual rigor with a style of kinship: a call for followers to participate, to challenge, to disagree. In Burey’s opinion, dissent at work is not noisy protest but ethical rejection – the act of opposing uniformity in workplaces that expect gratitude for basic acceptance. To resist, according to her view, is to challenge the stories institutions describe about justice and inclusion, and to reject engagement in practices that sustain unfairness. It could involve naming bias in a gathering, opting out of uncompensated “equity” labor, or setting boundaries around how much of one’s personal life is made available to the company. Dissent, the author proposes, is an declaration of personal dignity in spaces that typically encourage compliance. It constitutes a habit of principle rather than rebellion, a approach of insisting that an individual’s worth is not based on corporate endorsement.

Restoring Sincerity

She also refuses inflexible opposites. The book avoids just toss out “genuineness” wholesale: on the contrary, she calls for its reclamation. For Burey, sincerity is far from the unrestricted expression of character that organizational atmosphere often celebrates, but a more thoughtful correspondence between one’s values and personal behaviors – a honesty that resists alteration by corporate expectations. Rather than treating authenticity as a requirement to disclose excessively or conform to sanitized ideals of candor, Burey advises followers to keep the aspects of it rooted in sincerity, self-awareness and ethical clarity. In her view, the goal is not to abandon authenticity but to move it – to remove it from the executive theatrical customs and into relationships and organizations where trust, fairness and responsibility make {